留法台灣同學會-解悶來法國
廣告連結
    » 遊客:  註冊 | 登入 | 會員 | 遊樂園 | 擴充套件 | 說明

法國租屋 法國旅遊 法國旅館 法國留學 巴黎 法國語言學校 機票 租車
RSS 訂閱當前論壇  

作者:
標題: 美媒:總統大選 台灣是贏家 上一主題 | 下一主題
 
chaumet
解悶市長
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 31188
現金 5855
存款 0
精華 1
積分 6624
發帖 533
註冊 2007-5-30
來自 Taiwan
狀態 離線
#1  美媒:總統大選 台灣是贏家

美媒:總統大選 台灣是贏家

    * 2012-01-08 01:33
    * 旺報
    * 【記者慶正/綜合報導】

     美國《時代》雜誌(TIME)在最新一期,刊出亞洲版總編輯譚崇翰(Zoher Abdoolcarim)針對台灣總統大選評論文章,他認為這次選舉是台灣對中國大陸的公民投票,而無論大選結果如何,作為華人世界最自由地方,台灣都是贏家。

     馬蔡皆無法解決統獨

     譚崇翰說,馬蔡兩人都無法解決統獨問題,無論最後誰當選,都將決定未來4年台海關係的走向;北京方面必須了解,除了台灣的政治人物之外,也要重視了解和接受台灣2300萬人展現的價值與渴望,這就是民主和自由的力量。

     在這篇以「既不獨立也不統一」為題的專文中,譚崇翰指出,馬和蔡兩位候選人都具高度學術人文修養,出身名校充滿自信,熱情創新改變並關切土地的未來,可惜其中一人終將落選。儘管他們都無法解決台灣存在的問題,但兩人都使台灣驕傲。

     譚崇翰認為,台灣要捍衛的不光是領土,也是理念:華人世界能夠享有自由。因為台灣已具備強有力的民主,兩岸中華文化同源,媒體市場競爭激烈,科技、電影、美食等文創融於一爐,以及環保意識的天堂,完全是個公民社會。「中國擁有肌肉,台灣則有靈魂」,「這是真正的人民共和國。」

     譚崇翰肯定馬英九在任內穩健推動多項兩岸經貿協議,目前兩岸文化與教育交流頻繁,每天有上千名陸客來台,是1949年後兩岸最穩定的時期。

     馬任內 兩岸最穩定

     他指出,馬英九在專訪時表示,「參與中國大陸事務帶來風險,但對台灣有利」。馬英九和華府、北京當局,都希望當前的和平能夠持續,因為全球化時代沒有經濟體系可以獨善其身。

     專文提到,民進黨總統候選人蔡英文認為馬英九對中國大陸讓步太多。蔡英文說,「中國應該是一般的經貿夥伴,許多人關切台灣與大陸太過接近,走得太快,到某些時刻將難以回頭。」

     譚崇翰表示理解蔡英文的說法,但民進黨追求法理台獨,包括華府與北京在內,各界對蔡英文的勝選感到擔憂,兩岸可能會回到民進黨執政8年期間的冷戰情況。

     中美皆盼馬當選

     譚崇翰分析,中美雙方很明顯的都希望馬英九當選而非蔡英文,因為北京當局認為馬英九更為友善,華府方面則不希望見到蔡英文當選,而使美國捲入新的兩岸爭執之中。

     專文表示,美中兩大超強都沒有投票權,馬英九和蔡英文也無法把中美的意願加諸在台灣之上,決定掌握在台灣選民手中。

2012-1-7 10:37 PM
查看資料  發短訊  Blog  編輯帖子  引用回覆 頂部
 
chaumet
解悶市長
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 31188
現金 5855
存款 0
精華 1
積分 6624
發帖 533
註冊 2007-5-30
來自 Taiwan
狀態 離線
#2  

Thursday, Jan. 12, 2012
Neither Independence nor Unification
By Zoher Abdoolcarim

When I was in Taipei recently to talk to Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou and his chief rival, Tsai Ing-wen, about their prospects in the island's Jan. 14 elections, I dropped by the elegantly understated Fine Arts Museum. It was showing works by the global Chinese icon Ai Weiwei. All his signature pieces and installations so celebrated worldwide were on display: the bronze Circle of Animals/Zodiac Heads, the Coca-Cola urn, the catholic portraiture, an upgraded (specially for Taipei) Forever Bicycles.

To spotlight Ai's inability to attend, the exhibition was called "Ai Weiwei absent." Ai has become one of Beijing's public enemies for his outspokenness about what's wrong with China: he was jailed for nearly three months last year. Once, Ai was a darling of the Chinese establishment, but now it's inconceivable that any Ai event would be allowed in China or its supposedly autonomous satellites Hong Kong and Macau. Taiwan, which mainland China claims as part of the People's Republic, stands apart. That Ai's art has found a home — indeed, a refuge — on the island precisely during its intense election season makes total sense: Ai has an independent spirit, and so does Taiwan. (Read excerpts from TIME's exclusive interviews with Taiwan's presidential hopefuls.)

There's another parallel. Also like Ai, Taiwan is caged. The People's Republic insists that it is the "one China," and most governments and multilateral institutions comply. As a consequence, Taiwan is not acknowledged as a sovereign entity, operates in deeply restricted international space and is often underrated or simply off the world's radar. Yet Taiwan's coming contests for the presidency and the legislature — the first of some two dozen elections taking place worldwide in 2012 — remind us that this small island matters big time to the global community.

Economically, Taiwan punches above its weight. Its IT industries, for example, rank among the biggest anywhere, as does its hoard of foreign-exchange reserves. Geopolitically, it is a perennial potential flash point. For the Chinese leadership and most mainland Chinese, Taiwan is a charged issue. Beijing has labeled Taiwan a renegade province that one day must return to the motherland, by force if necessary. (By some estimates, China has as many as 2,000 missiles locked and aimed at Taiwan.) Washington, through Congress's 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, is obliged to help arm the island. Whenever the U.S. sells Taipei military hardware, especially warplanes, China vehemently protests the action as interference in its internal affairs. Conflict over Taiwan between the two powers, while improbable, cannot be ruled out. (Read "How Will China React to U.S. Arms Deal with Taiwan?")

There's a more crucial, cosmic element to Taiwan. It is worth defending, if not as a territory, then as an idea: that freedom is compatible with the Chinese world. Taiwan could do a better job strengthening rule of law and fighting corruption. But in many stellar ways, it is the un-China: a vigorous democracy; an alternative fount of Chinese language and culture; an arena of fiercely competitive (and partisan) media; a crucible of creativity (tech, film, food); a haven of environmental consciousness (you'll find recycling bins on remote hilltops). Heck, even the people are nicer — literally a civil society. China has muscle; Taiwan has soul. It's the true people's republic.

Taiwan's voice, particularly during elections, is strong enough to reverberate even on the mainland. The islanders take politics very seriously — it seems to suffuse their lives — because they know their votes really count. In the presidential contest, the 99% figure a great deal: Tsai and her opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) accuse Ma and his ruling Kuomintang (KMT) of pandering to Big Business and ignoring income inequality. But beyond livelihood issues, the giant shadow of the mainland looms largest. The elections are, in truth, a referendum on China.

Read "Building Bridges to China."

In his first four-year term, Ma, 61, forged a slew of reciprocal commercial agreements with the mainland. (China is now Taiwan's biggest trading partner and investment destination.) Academic and cultural exchanges have become common, and thousands of Chinese tourists visit Taiwan daily. Relations today between Taipei and Beijing are the coziest since 1949, the year the KMT lost to the Chinese Communist Party in a civil war on the mainland and retreated, with hundreds of thousands of refugees in tow, to Taiwan. Ma, Beijing and Washington all want the current peace to keep. Ma believes that in a globalized world, no economy can be an island. Engagement with China "carries risk," he told me, but "it's in Taiwan's interest."

Tsai, 55, demurs. She says she is willing to do business with China — on Taiwan's terms. She thinks Ma has given away too much to an authoritarian state. "We [should] treat China as a normal trading and economic partner," Tsai told me. "A lot of people are concerned that we are moving so close and so quickly to China that we would at some point pass the point of no return, meaning the only option is to be with China in the future rather than being on our own." That sounds perfectly reasonable. But because the DPP advocates de jure independence for Taiwan (an extreme red flag to China), many interested parties — most notably Beijing and Washington — worry about a Tsai victory. One scenario: a return to the cross-strait cold war witnessed during the DPP's eight years in office before Ma's election in 2008. It's clear to all that China and the U.S., which seldom agree on much, both prefer Ma over Tsai — Beijing because it sees him as friendlier, Washington because it doesn't want to be caught in the middle of any new quarrel between Taiwan and China if Tsai wins. (See the world's most influential people of 2008.)

The planet's two strongest nations don't have a vote, however, and neither Ma nor Tsai can impose their will on Taiwan. The decider is the island's electorate. Under Ma, Taiwan has been politically stable and its economy resilient amid the downturn in the West. Yet polls have Tsai right on Ma's heels if margins of error are taken into account, meaning that her stances resonate with a substantial proportion of voters. Whoever they choose will determine the course of cross-strait relations for at least the next four years. Beijing has to understand and accept that it must deal not just with one or two political figures in Taiwan but also with the values and aspirations of 23 million people. That's democracy. That's the power of freedom.

Given that Taiwan is its own political, economic, military and cultural master, it's surreal, and somewhat tragic, that such a discrete and open society cannot be a normal nation. While much of the blame lies, of course, with Beijing — which, through its clout, blocks any meaningful overseas role for Taipei — much is also Taiwan's own doing. Two polar illusions, rooted in misguided hope, have governed the island: that Taiwan will win back the mainland and unify the two as a noncommunist state (the KMT's raison d'être) and that Taiwan will be formally recognized as an independent country (the DPP's cause). For too long, Taiwan has been defined by the struggle for one or the other. But now there's a growing realization that both unification and independence are impossible dreams, so much so that you don't hear those words mentioned in Taiwan anywhere as often as before. (Read "Taiwan: How to Reboot the Dragon.")

What should Taiwan be? Neither Ma nor Tsai can resolve the island's existential problem. In fact, they reinforce it. Still, they do Taiwan proud. Both are informed, confident, articulate (in English too), well educated (he has a doctorate from Harvard, she from the London School of Economics), well traveled, passionate about making a difference and genuinely concerned about the future of their land — traits any electorate would want in its leaders. Too bad one of them has to lose. But whatever happens, as the freest place in the Chinese world, Taiwan wins.

— with reporting by Natalie Tso / Taipei

2012-1-7 10:42 PM
查看資料  發短訊  Blog  編輯帖子  引用回覆 頂部


   可列印版本 | 推薦給朋友 | 訂閱主題 | 收藏主題  

 


Powered by Discuz! 2.5 Deluxe Build0702 © 2001-2005 Comsenz Technology Ltd.
Processed in 0.023638 second(s), 7 queries
本地時區為 GMT+8, 現在時間是 2019-12-10 21:24 加入收藏夾 - 清除 Cookies - 聯繫我們 - 留法台灣同學會-解悶來法國 - Archiver